Title: The Science of Self-Learning and Psychological Hacks: Evidence-Based Strategies for Cognitive Optimization and Mental Well-Being

 Title: The Science of Self-Learning and Psychological Hacks: Evidence-Based Strategies for Cognitive Optimization and Mental Well-Being

Author: Dr. Shekhar and Affiliation with Team Psychology Doctor's Forum for All 🏥⚖️

Abstract

Self-learning, the autonomous acquisition of knowledge and skills, has become an essential competency in an era characterized by rapid technological advancement and information abundance. Concurrently, the popular discourse on "psychological hacks" promises rapid solutions for enhancing productivity, motivation, and mental well-being. However, the scientific validity of many such claims remains questionable. This article provides a comprehensive, clinically verified examination of the cognitive and neurobiological mechanisms underlying effective self-learning, while critically evaluating the evidence base for commonly promoted psychological hacks. Drawing upon established theories of self-regulated learning, cognitive psychology, and neuroscience, this review synthesizes findings from randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and longitudinal studies. The article identifies evidence-based strategies that genuinely enhance learning and psychological functioning, including spaced repetition, retrieval practice, interleaving, implementation intentions, and mindfulness-based techniques. Conversely, it highlights popular hacks that lack empirical support, such as learning styles-based instruction and brain training games. The findings offer practical, scientifically grounded recommendations for educators, clinicians, and individuals seeking to optimize cognitive performance and mental health. This article serves as a rigorous resource for those committed to evidence-based practice in psychology and education.

Keywords: self-regulated learning, spaced repetition, retrieval practice, psychological hacks, cognitive optimization, implementation intentions, mindfulness, evidence-based practice

1. Introduction

The modern individual is inundated with information. The ability to independently acquire, retain, and apply knowledge—self-learning—has transitioned from a desirable skill to a fundamental necessity for personal and professional survival (OECD, 2019). In parallel, the wellness and productivity industries have popularized the concept of "psychological hacks," presenting them as shortcuts to mental efficiency, emotional regulation, and behavioral change. These hacks, often disseminated through social media and popular literature, range from simple breathing techniques to complex cognitive reframing exercises.

The appeal of psychological hacks is understandable. They promise maximal results with minimal effort, a proposition that resonates with a culture obsessed with optimization. However, the gap between popular claims and scientific evidence is often vast. Many widely circulated hacks lack rigorous empirical validation, and some may even be counterproductive (Simons et al., 2016). Conversely, several less sensational but robustly supported strategies from cognitive and educational psychology are underutilized by the general public (Dunlosky et al., 2013).

This article aims to bridge this gap. It provides a rigorous, clinically verified exploration of the science underlying self-learning and psychological hacks. The primary objectives are threefold:

1. To elucidate the cognitive and neurobiological mechanisms that facilitate effective self-learning.

2. To critically evaluate the evidence base for popular psychological hacks, distinguishing between those that are empirically supported and those that lack scientific validity.

3. To provide evidence-based recommendations for individuals, educators, and clinicians seeking to enhance learning outcomes and psychological well-being.

By grounding the discussion in peer-reviewed research, this article seeks to empower readers to make informed decisions about their cognitive and mental health practices, moving beyond anecdotal claims toward scientifically validated strategies.

2. Theoretical Foundations of Self-Learning

Self-learning is not a monolithic activity; it is a complex, multi-faceted process governed by cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational factors. Understanding the theoretical underpinnings of this process is essential for distinguishing effective strategies from ineffective fads.

2.1 Self-Regulated Learning (SRL)

The dominant theoretical framework for understanding self-learning is Self-Regulated Learning (SRL). Zimmerman (2002) defines SRL as "self-generated thoughts, feelings, and actions that are planned and cyclically adapted to the attainment of personal goals." SRL is not a fixed trait but a dynamic, cyclical process comprising three phases:

· Forethought Phase: This involves task analysis (setting goals, strategic planning) and self-motivation beliefs (self-efficacy, outcome expectations, intrinsic interest). Learners who excel in this phase set specific, challenging goals and believe in their capacity to achieve them.

· Performance Phase: This involves self-control (employing specific learning strategies, such as imagery or self-instruction) and self-observation (self-recording, self-experimentation). Effective learners actively monitor their progress and adjust their strategies as needed.

· Self-Reflection Phase: This involves self-judgment (evaluating one's performance against a standard) and self-reaction (attributing causes to outcomes, experiencing satisfaction or dissatisfaction). This phase informs the next cycle of learning, creating a feedback loop that drives continuous improvement (Zimmerman, 2002).

Research consistently demonstrates that individuals who engage in high-quality SRL outperform those who do not, regardless of innate intelligence (Dignath & Büttner, 2008). This finding is empowering: it suggests that learning is a skill that can be developed, not a fixed ability.

2.2 Cognitive Load Theory

Cognitive Load Theory (CLT), developed by John Sweller, provides a framework for understanding the constraints of human working memory (Sweller, 1988). Working memory, the mental workspace where information is actively processed, is severely limited in both capacity and duration. CLT distinguishes between three types of cognitive load:

· Intrinsic Load: The inherent difficulty of the material being learned. This is largely fixed and depends on the complexity of the information and the learner's prior knowledge.

· Extraneous Load: The unnecessary cognitive burden imposed by poorly designed instructional materials or inefficient learning strategies. This load is avoidable and should be minimized.

· Germane Load: The cognitive effort dedicated to the meaningful processing and construction of schemas (mental frameworks for organizing knowledge). This is the "good" load that leads to deep learning.

Effective self-learning, according to CLT, involves minimizing extraneous load and maximizing germane load. Strategies that introduce unnecessary complexity or split attention (e.g., multitasking, reading text while listening to a lecture on a different topic) overwhelm working memory and impede learning (Mayer & Moreno, 2003). Conversely, strategies that organize information and facilitate schema construction enhance learning.

3. The Neurobiology of Self-Learning

Effective self-learning is not merely a psychological construct; it has a tangible neurobiological basis. Understanding the brain's plasticity—its capacity to reorganize itself in response to experience—is fundamental to appreciating how learning strategies exert their effects.

3.1 Neuroplasticity and Long-Term Potentiation

Neuroplasticity refers to the brain's lifelong ability to form new neural connections and strengthen existing ones in response to learning and experience (Kolb & Whishaw, 1998). A key cellular mechanism underlying learning and memory is Long-Term Potentiation (LTP). LTP is a long-lasting enhancement in signal transmission between two neurons that results from their synchronous stimulation (Bliss & Lømo, 1973). When we engage in focused, effortful learning, the involved neural pathways are strengthened through LTP, making the information easier to retrieve in the future.

Conversely, neural pathways that are not used are weakened through a process called synaptic pruning (Huttenlocher, 1979). This "use it or lose it" principle underscores the importance of consistent, deliberate practice in self-learning. Each act of retrieval or application reinforces the neural network associated with that knowledge or skill.

3.2 The Role of Neurotransmitters

Several neurotransmitters play critical roles in learning and motivation.

· Dopamine: Often mischaracterized as the "pleasure chemical," dopamine is more accurately described as the "motivation and reward prediction" chemical. It is released not only when a reward is received but, more importantly, when a reward is anticipated. Dopamine signals to the brain that an event is salient and worth paying attention to, thereby facilitating learning and goal-directed behavior (Schultz, 2007). Effective self-learning leverages this system by breaking down large goals into smaller, achievable milestones, each of which triggers a small dopamine release, sustaining motivation over time.

· Norepinephrine: This neurotransmitter is associated with arousal, alertness, and focus. Moderate levels of norepinephrine are optimal for learning, enhancing attention and memory consolidation (Sara, 2009). Strategies that promote a state of focused alertness, such as taking a short walk or engaging in brief, intense exercise before a study session, can optimize norepinephrine levels.

· Acetylcholine: This neurotransmitter is crucial for attention, learning, and memory. It plays a key role in the brain's ability to filter out distractions and focus on relevant stimuli (Hasselmo, 2006). A quiet, distraction-free learning environment supports optimal acetylcholine function.

4. Scientifically Validated Psychological Hacks for Learning

The term "hack" often implies a shortcut. However, the most effective psychological strategies for learning are not shortcuts but rather the application of well-established cognitive principles. These are the "hacks" that withstand scientific scrutiny.

4.1 Spaced Repetition

Spaced repetition involves reviewing information at gradually increasing intervals. Instead of cramming all study into one session (massed practice), the learner distributes their practice over time. The "spacing effect" is one of the most robust and replicable findings in cognitive psychology (Ebbinghaus, 1885; Cepeda et al., 2006).

The mechanism underlying spaced repetition is often explained by the "study-phase retrieval" theory (Thios & D'Agostino, 1976). Each time information is retrieved after a delay, the act of retrieval itself strengthens the memory trace. The longer the delay, the more effortful the retrieval, and the greater the strengthening effect.

A meta-analysis of 254 studies involving over 14,000 participants found a significant advantage for spaced practice over massed practice across a wide range of tasks and materials (Cepeda et al., 2006). The optimal spacing interval depends on the desired retention duration. For long-term retention, intervals should be progressively extended (e.g., review after 1 day, then 3 days, then a week, then a month). Digital tools like Anki and SuperMemo leverage algorithms to automate this scheduling, making spaced repetition a highly practical and effective "hack."

4.2 Retrieval Practice (The Testing Effect)

Retrieval practice, also known as the testing effect, involves actively recalling information from memory rather than passively re-reading or re-watching material. The act of retrieving information strengthens the memory trace and makes it more accessible in the future (Roediger & Karpicke, 2006).

In a landmark study, Roediger and Karpicke (2006) had students read prose passages and then either re-read the passages or take a recall test. Students who took the test performed significantly better on a final assessment one week later, even though they had spent less total time with the material. This finding has been replicated hundreds of times.

The power of retrieval practice lies in its difficulty. Effortful retrieval engages deeper cognitive processing, consolidating the memory and creating multiple retrieval routes. Practical techniques include using flashcards, taking practice tests, writing summaries from memory, or simply closing the book and attempting to recall key concepts. This strategy directly counters the common but ineffective "illusion of competence" created by passive re-reading, which feels productive but yields minimal long-term retention.

4.3 Interleaving

Interleaving involves mixing different types of problems or topics within a single study session, rather than studying one type of problem exhaustively before moving to the next (blocking). For example, instead of practicing only algebra problems for an hour, a student would mix algebra, geometry, and trigonometry problems.

While interleaving often feels more difficult and leads to slower initial progress, it consistently produces superior long-term retention and transfer of skills (Rohrer & Taylor, 2007). This is because interleaving forces the brain to discriminate between different types of problems and select the appropriate strategy, strengthening the conceptual understanding and the ability to apply knowledge in novel contexts. Blocking, in contrast, allows for the automatic application of a single strategy without engaging in this deeper discrimination process.

4.4 Elaborative Interrogation and Self-Explanation

These are two related strategies that involve generating explanations for new information.

· Elaborative Interrogation: This involves asking oneself "why" questions about the material. For example, while reading about a historical event, one might ask, "Why did this event lead to this particular outcome?" Answering these "why" questions forces the learner to connect new information to existing knowledge, creating a richer and more interconnected memory network (Pressley et al., 1987).

· Self-Explanation: This involves explaining the steps of a process or the logic of an argument to oneself. This strategy is particularly effective for learning complex, procedural knowledge, such as mathematical problem-solving or scientific reasoning (Chi et al., 1989). By articulating the underlying rationale, learners identify gaps in their understanding and construct more accurate mental models.

Both strategies enhance learning by promoting deep, meaningful processing, as opposed to superficial memorization.

5. Scientifically Validated Psychological Hacks for Motivation and Well-Being

Beyond learning strategies, several psychological techniques have strong empirical support for enhancing motivation, emotional regulation, and overall well-being.

5.1 Implementation Intentions (If-Then Plans)

One of the most robust "hacks" for bridging the gap between intention and action is the implementation intention, an "if-then" plan that specifies when, where, and how one will perform a goal-directed behavior (Gollwitzer, 1999). For example, instead of saying, "I will exercise more," one would say, "If it is 7 AM on a weekday, then I will go for a 30-minute run."

A meta-analysis of 94 studies found a highly significant, medium-to-large effect size for implementation intentions on goal attainment (Gollwitzer & Sheeran, 2006). The power of this technique lies in its automation of behavior. By pre-deciding a specific cue and response, the individual delegates control of the behavior to the environment, reducing reliance on conscious willpower. When the cue is encountered, the intended action is triggered automatically, bypassing the need for deliberation, which can often lead to procrastination.

5.2 Temptation Bundling

This strategy, rooted in the principles of operant conditioning, involves pairing an activity that provides immediate gratification (a "want") with an activity that provides long-term benefits but is less immediately appealing (a "should"). For example, one might only allow themselves to listen to their favorite podcast while exercising, or only watch a beloved TV show while doing household chores.

Research by Milkman et al. (2014) demonstrated the effectiveness of this approach. Participants who were given access to an engaging audiobook only while at the gym exercised significantly more frequently than a control group. Temptation bundling works by making the "should" activity more immediately rewarding, leveraging the brain's dopamine system to motivate behavior that might otherwise be avoided.

5.3 Mindfulness-Based Techniques

Mindfulness, defined as "paying attention in a particular way: on purpose, in the present moment, and non-judgmentally" (Kabat-Zinn, 1994), has been the subject of extensive research. While not a "hack" in the sense of a quick fix, regular mindfulness practice produces profound and lasting changes in brain structure and function.

Neuroimaging studies have shown that long-term mindfulness practitioners exhibit increased gray matter density in brain regions associated with learning, memory, emotion regulation, and self-referential processing, such as the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex (Hölzel et al., 2011). Furthermore, mindfulness-based interventions, such as Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) and Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT), have been shown to be as effective as antidepressant medication in preventing relapse of major depression (Kuyken et al., 2016).

Specific mindfulness techniques, such as a brief 5-minute breathing exercise before a study or work session, can serve as an effective "hack" to reduce anxiety, improve focus, and transition into a state of calm alertness conducive to learning.

5.4 The Pomodoro Technique

The Pomodoro Technique is a time management method that involves working in focused, 25-minute intervals separated by short, 5-minute breaks (Cirillo, 2006). While its popularity is largely anecdotal, its underlying principles are consistent with cognitive psychology.

The technique effectively leverages the brain's limited capacity for sustained attention. By breaking work into manageable chunks, it reduces the cognitive load associated with long, unstructured periods of focus. The scheduled breaks serve as a form of "diffuse mode" thinking, a term popularized by Oakley (2014), allowing the brain to consolidate information and make creative connections. Furthermore, the ticking timer creates a sense of urgency and external accountability, which can help overcome initial resistance to starting a task.

6. Debunking Popular but Unscientific Psychological Hacks

The marketplace of ideas is filled with popular psychological hacks that, despite their widespread acceptance, lack empirical support. Recognizing these myths is as important as adopting valid strategies.

6.1 The Myth of Learning Styles

The "learning styles" hypothesis proposes that individuals learn best when instruction is tailored to their preferred sensory modality—visual, auditory, or kinesthetic. This idea is immensely popular, with a majority of teachers endorsing it (Dekker et al., 2012). However, a comprehensive review of the literature found no credible evidence to support the idea that matching instruction to a learner's self-reported style improves learning outcomes (Pashler et al., 2008).

The persistence of this myth is problematic because it wastes time and resources on unnecessary assessment and customization. More importantly, it can lead learners to believe they are incapable of learning through certain modalities, creating a self-fulfilling prophecy that limits their learning potential. Effective learning is better predicted by the use of evidence-based strategies like retrieval practice and spaced repetition, which are beneficial regardless of an individual's stated preferences.

6.2 Brain Training Games

A multi-billion dollar industry is built on the claim that commercially available "brain training" games can improve general cognitive function and protect against age-related decline. While these games may improve performance on the specific tasks they train, the evidence for "far transfer"—improvement on unrelated cognitive abilities—is weak.

A large-scale study by Owen et al. (2010) involving over 11,000 participants found that six weeks of online cognitive training did not lead to improvements in general cognitive function, even though participants improved on the specific tasks they practiced. A meta-analysis by Simons et al. (2016) reached similar conclusions, finding that the evidence for broad cognitive enhancement from brain training is limited and often methodologically flawed. The most reliable ways to maintain cognitive health remain physical exercise, social engagement, and lifelong learning (Hertzog et al., 2008).

6.3 The "Power Pose" Phenomenon

The "power pose" hack, which suggests that adopting expansive, confident postures can increase testosterone, decrease cortisol, and improve performance in high-stakes situations, gained immense popularity after a viral TED talk. However, the original findings were based on a small sample and failed to replicate in a large-scale, pre-registered study (Ranehill et al., 2015).

While adopting a confident posture may have a small positive effect on one's subjective feelings of confidence, the dramatic physiological claims (e.g., significant hormonal changes) are unsupported by rigorous science. The rise and fall of the power pose phenomenon serves as a cautionary tale about the rapid dissemination of psychological hacks before they have been adequately validated.

7. Clinical Applications and Recommendations

The principles outlined in this article have significant implications for clinical practice, education, and personal development.

7.1 For Clinicians

Mental health professionals can integrate these evidence-based strategies into their therapeutic interventions.

· Cognitive Remediation: For patients with depression or ADHD who struggle with attention and memory, teaching them retrieval practice and spaced repetition can improve their cognitive functioning and treatment adherence. For example, a therapist might use spaced repetition software to help a patient with depression remember key cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) concepts.

· Behavioral Activation: Implementation intentions are a powerful tool for promoting behavioral activation in patients with depression. Instead of simply suggesting, "try to be more active," a clinician can work with the patient to create specific "if-then" plans (e.g., "If I feel a wave of sadness after dinner, then I will call my sister for a 10-minute conversation").

· Relapse Prevention: Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) has a strong evidence base for preventing depressive relapse. Clinicians should be trained in these techniques and offer them to patients with recurrent depression.

7.2 For Educators

Educators should explicitly teach students how to learn. This means moving beyond simply delivering content to explicitly instructing students on the science of learning.

· Curriculum Design: Incorporate frequent low-stakes testing (retrieval practice) into the curriculum. Use interleaved problem sets in mathematics and science.

· Study Skills Training: Replace study skills courses that teach ineffective strategies (like highlighting and re-reading) with programs grounded in cognitive science that teach spaced repetition, self-explanation, and effective time management.

· Assessment: Recognize that assessment is not just a measure of learning but a powerful tool for learning. Formative assessment should be frequent and low-pressure.

7.3 For Individuals

The most empowering message is that anyone can become a more effective learner and improve their psychological well-being by adopting a few evidence-based habits.

· Plan Your Learning: Do not just "study more." Study smarter. Create a schedule that incorporates spaced repetition and retrieval practice. Use flashcards, close the book and recall, and teach the material to someone else.

· Optimize Your Environment: Minimize distractions. Turn off notifications, find a quiet space, and use techniques like the Pomodoro Technique to structure your focus.

· Manage Your Motivation: Do not rely on willpower alone. Use implementation intentions to automate desired behaviors and temptation bundling to make difficult tasks more appealing.

· Be Skeptical: Approach popular psychological hacks with a critical eye. Ask for the evidence. Is there a randomized controlled trial or meta-analysis supporting this claim? If not, be wary.

8. Limitations and Future Directions

This review has several limitations. First, it is a narrative review, not a systematic one. While the referenced studies are drawn from peer-reviewed, high-quality sources, a systematic review with predefined inclusion criteria would provide a more exhaustive synthesis. Second, the field of cognitive psychology and neuroscience is rapidly evolving. The "evidence-based" strategies highlighted here are supported by current research, but our understanding may be refined or challenged by future findings.

Future research should focus on:

1. Individual Differences: How do factors such as age, personality, and prior knowledge moderate the effectiveness of different learning strategies?

2. Technology-Enhanced Learning: How can we design educational technology that leverages principles like spaced repetition and retrieval practice more effectively?

3. Longitudinal Outcomes: What are the long-term effects of consistently applying these strategies on academic achievement, career success, and mental well-being?

4. Combating Misinformation: How can we more effectively communicate the science of learning to the public and counteract the persistent appeal of unscientific "hacks"?

9. Conclusion

The science of self-learning and psychological hacks offers a powerful antidote to the misinformation and superficiality that often characterize popular self-help discourse. By grounding our practices in the principles of cognitive psychology and neuroscience, we can move beyond empty promises and adopt strategies that genuinely work. The evidence is clear: effective learning is not a matter of innate talent but of employing the right techniques. Spaced repetition, retrieval practice, and interleaving are the "hacks" that build durable knowledge. Implementation intentions, temptation bundling, and mindfulness are the tools that build motivation and resilience.

Ultimately, the most profound psychological hack is not a shortcut but a shift in understanding. It is the realization that our brains are malleable, our abilities are not fixed, and that we possess the agency to shape our own minds. By embracing the science of learning, we empower ourselves to become lifelong learners, capable of adapting, growing, and thriving in an ever-changing world.

10. References

· Bliss, T. V. P., & Lømo, T. (1973). Long-lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the anaesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path. The Journal of Physiology, 232(2), 331-356.

· Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 354-380.

· Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13(2), 145-182.

· Cirillo, F. (2006). The Pomodoro Technique. FC Garage.

· Dekker, S., Lee, N. C., Howard-Jones, P., & Jolles, J. (2012). Neuromyths in education: Prevalence and predictors of misconceptions among teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 429.

· Dignath, C., & Büttner, G. (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students. A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognition and Learning, 3(3), 231-264.

· Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students' learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4-58.

· Ebbinghaus, H. (1885). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. Dover.

· Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54(7), 493-503.

· Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69-119.

· Hasselmo, M. E. (2006). The role of acetylcholine in learning and memory. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 16(6), 710-715.

· Hertzog, C., Kramer, A. F., Wilson, R. S., & Lindenberger, U. (2008). Enrichment effects on adult cognitive development: Can the functional capacity of older adults be preserved and enhanced? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(1), 1-65.

· Hölzel, B. K., Carmody, J., Vangel, M., Congleton, C., Yerramsetti, S. M., Gard, T., & Lazar, S. W. (2011). Mindfulness practice leads to increases in regional brain gray matter density. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 191(1), 36-43.

· Huttenlocher, P. R. (1979). Synaptic density in human frontal cortex—developmental changes and effects of aging. Brain Research, 163(2), 195-205.

· Kabat-Zinn, J. (1994). Wherever you go, there you are: Mindfulness meditation in everyday life. Hyperion.

· Kolb, B., & Whishaw, I. Q. (1998). Brain plasticity and behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 43-64.

· Kuyken, W., Warren, F. C., Taylor, R. S., Whalley, B., Crane, C., Bondolfi, G., ... & Dalgleish, T. (2016). Efficacy of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy in prevention of depressive relapse: An individual patient data meta-analysis from randomized trials. JAMA Psychiatry, 73(6), 565-574.

· Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43-52.

· Milkman, K. L., Minson, J. A., & Volpp, K. G. M. (2014). Holding the hunger games hostage at the gym: An evaluation of temptation bundling. Management Science, 60(2), 283-299.

· Oakley, B. (2014). A mind for numbers: How to excel at math and science (even if you flunked algebra). TarcherPerigee.

· OECD. (2019). OECD skills outlook 2019: Thriving in a digital world. OECD Publishing.

· Owen, A. M., Hampshire, A., Grahn, J. A., Stenton, R., Dajani, S., Burns, A. S., ... & Ballard, C. G. (2010). Putting brain training to the test. Nature, 465(7299), 775-778.

· Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105-119.

· Pressley, M., McDaniel, M. A., Turnure, J. E., Wood, E., & Ahmad, M. (1987). Generation and precision of elaboration: Effects on intentional and incidental learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13(2), 291-300.

· Ranehill, E., Dreber, A., Johannesson, M., Leiberg, S., Sul, S., & Weber, R. A. (2015). Assessing the robustness of power posing: No effect on hormones and risk tolerance in a large sample of men and women. Psychological Science, 26(5), 653-656.

· Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249-255.

· Rohrer, D., & Taylor, K. (2007). The shuffling of mathematics problems improves learning. Instructional Science, 35(6), 481-498.

· Sara, S. J. (2009). The locus coeruleus and noradrenergic modulation of cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(3), 211-223.

· Schultz, W. (2007). Multiple dopamine functions at different time courses. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 30, 259-288.

· Simons, D. J., Boot, W. R., Charness, N., Gathercole, S. E., Chabris, C. F., Hambrick, D. Z., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (2016). Do "brain-training" programs work? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17(3), 103-186.

· Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285.

· Thios, S. J., & D'Agostino, P. R. (1976). Effects of repetition as a function of study-phase retrieval. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15(5), 529-536.

· Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64-70.

Disclaimer: This article is provided strictly for educational and academic purposes only. It is not intended to serve as medical, psychological, or professional advice, and it should not be used for the diagnosis or treatment of any mental health condition. The author and publisher assume no responsibility or liability for any consequences arising from the use of this material.